Drew Curtis' book ”It’s Not News, It’s FARK" concludes with an; ”Epilogue: What Should Mass Media Be Doing Instead?".
I’ve blogged this book twice, on July 30 and August 10.
In his 'Epilogue' Curtis continues to work himself into a lather over mass media daring to publish articles that are lightweight pap. Yet, I contend what is one reader’s lightweight pap, is to another an interesting article. E.g. some people regard gossip-driven women’s magazines as journalism out to lunch, though given the circulation figures a lot of people disagree.
In discussing the future of mass media Curtis claims that newspapers are dying. He’s quite wrong here, as he fails to understand the nature of display advertising in newspapers.
For example, the large retail chain stores and supermarkets on a weekly basis need to get their advertising message (specials, sales etc) across to a mass market and the most effective method remains newsprint.
Radio and TV were never able to replace print as this mass-message carrier and the internet certainly isn’t going to. Moreover, in New Zealand at least, newspaper circulations are buoyant. People still buy them and advertisers continue to advertise.
He then gets upset because wire stories get repeated through numerous newspapers and online. So what! The vast majority of people only access a limited number of news sources. For me that’s the local daily newspaper here in Auckland, the Stuff website through the working day and if I get the time the late news bulletin on TV. I’ll wander through some of the heavy-hitter international newspaper/magazine sites now and again, though not all that often.
Curtis states this: ”Their [Mass Media] danger is the subject of this book, which is whether they lose themselves in this morass of crap they are cranking out on a daily basis. You can be a news leader or a crap peddler, not both."
Oh dear. Look there is a difference between serious broadsheets and tabloid newspapers. Yes, some of the broadsheets do run articles that might, by some, be considered lightweight. Another word that could be used is entertaining, although certainly not by Drew Curtis.
Then there is this on page 259:
”Mass Media outlets have a decision to make: Either embrace the dark side and throw away all pretense of being a serious news media outlet, as some have already done, or retrench and become a leader of real honest-to-god serious information. It turns out there’s a way to do both: split off the Not News from the news. Make another Web site, spin off another TV channel. Put all the Not News into another section of the newspaper. Keep it away from the real news. Stop poisoning real news with the kind of spoon-feeding filler garbage that we’ve discussed throughout this book"
I believe quality newspapers and magazines such as the New Yorker, The Economist, The Wall Street Journal etc make a mockery of that statement and he actually states this on page 253.
”People don’t really want to watch or read news that does the right thing. The McNeil-Lehrer NewsHour was a great example of this. Quality news, mostly information, and no one watched it."
Curtis also goes on to claim that the real challenge for Mass Media is the ”looming catastrophic drop in advertising income". It has already happened. Classified advertising has been decimated in newspapers because of the internet, particularly international buy-sell sites like Ebay and locally, here in New Zealand, Trade Me.
Display advertising, generally, is sticking with the only format that can truly deliver a mass market; newspapers and magazines.
He points out the baldly obvious point that the internet delivers reliable advertising statistics. However, a shop that has just sold out of a product after advertising in its local newspaper is going to regard the ”Sorry, sold out” sign as a pretty reliable ‘statistic’.
He wraps up his ‘Media Critique’ with this Yoda-like saying.
”OK, enough of this serious crap. I will swear by one thing though: Things are bad but they’re no worse than they have been in the past. And in many cases they’re a damn sight better.”
The book concludes with the weirdest story Curtis has seen on Fark. In the bizarro world of Fark.com the most memorable story for Curtis was: ”Man who stapled his penis to a cross and set it on fire in a bar bet says he couldn’t be more thrilled to have received an honorary Darwin Award”.
No wonder Curtis has such a one-eyed and mean-spirited view of the media that his website parasitically feeds off.
For a media-synthesis site (that likes journalists) try this link
Or this
Or this ”The internet and the news business”






