Blogs

« August 2008 | Main | November 2008 »

When social networking goes bad

After writing about technology for the best part of five years, you would think I would have learned a trick or two about the effective use of such technology.

I have largely mastered the use of most of the technology in my life - such as my original third generation iPod (that would be the pre-Clickwheel model), the electric toothbrush (which I destroyed removing incorrectly from its charger late one night) and my espresso machine (OK, I can’t froth milk).

Anyhow, in recent times I’ve also familiarised myself extensively in the ins and outs of social networking websites. While I’m yet to Twitter, I’ve blogged (this is one), Facebooked, MySpaced (briefly), Windows Live IMed and I’ve LinkedIn.

Which brings me to my point… Much these online services are quite straightforward to use, which is evidenced in the massive uptake of sites such as Facebook.

LinkedIn on the other hand is not as simple to master, as I discovered to my own embarrassment recently.

Lately, I’ve been on a mission to drive up my LinkedIn connections - partly in a silly game of trying to beat a rival who has just a few more connections than I do (Of course if you received an invitation from me and you’re in the tech industry, that was a not part of the contest - I genuinely wanted to have you as a connection.)

So, I imported all my Gmail contacts into my LinkedIn account to send out invitation from there.

I was surprised to see that LinkedIn sucked just about every email address I had ever used - not just those in my Contacts list.

What I did not notice however is that it had also automatically selected all the imported contacts. I then proceeded to select the contacts I wanted to invite - but of course what I was actually doing was un-selecting them!

This did look to me odd at time and I could not quite work out who was and who was not selected, but I decided to click on the Send Invitations button anyway expecting to see a pop-up asking me to confirm the list of contacts I wanted to invite.

There wasn’t one and the invitations were sent. At first I thought nothing of it, but then it dawned on me that perhaps the invitation was sent to everyone on the list.

My suspicions were confirmed a few minutes later when one eager beaver accepted - it was a friend of a friend whose email address I didn’t even know I had.

Paranoid and a little freaked, I decided to peruse the list of people I had invited - and was thoroughly mortified!

The list comprised the most random selection of people - many who would think I was truly odd or slightly stalkerish for trying to connect with them.

It included a builder I had a dispute with, a painter I used to help fix the builder’s screw ups, my bank manager, someone I traded with on TradeMe, my landlord, my tenant, my mother (would you add your mother on LinkedIn?), a backpacker hostel I stayed at in Singapore last year, a couple of estate agents I viewed properties with, my sister’s ex, and my own home email address.

What was really odd is that LinkedIn not only imported addresses I had personally sent emails to, but also people who were CCd on other people’s emails - hence the friend of a friend who eagerly accepted.

So this increased the number of people potentially thinking I’m a freak or who are potential freaks themselves…

On the plus side, I am now connected to many people who in retrospect I would have added anyway and who I believe are valuable additions to my network.

And I’m sure many of the random people who accepted my invitation will be useful contacts to have some day - already the TradeMe trader has given me some helpful tips.

At least I’ve not received any replies accusing me of being a stalker, or any from people I suspect of being slightly deranged…

Gettin' chipped

There is a DVD, Zeitgeist, peddling the old-hat conspiracy theory that the world is run by a secret government - in this case a banking cartel. It’s laughable really, because if a banking cartel has been running the world for the past 100 or so years then they are clearly doing a pretty crap job.

Though deeply, died-in-the-wool conspiracy theorists would say the current economic crisis, just like Asia melting down in the mid-90s and the 1987 crash etc were all in fact planned.

At the end of Zeitgeist, the producers get on their hobby horse over the ‘microchips to be implanted in humans' bedtime horror story.

It's the ultimate Orwellian nightmare; we are tagged at birth with a microchip and the omnipotent world government - the one that can't actually control the world’s financial market - will have complete control over us all.

Those seeking just such a conspiracy theory could say the new world order is practising with animal microchipping and we are next.

However, think of the convenience of being ‘chipped' if you’re a frequent flyer. In say 10 years you could be able to stroll into the airport drop your bags on the scales, wave your ‘chipped' wrist under the scanner, briefly stop and watch the ‘dead trees technology' queue of people clutching their tickets and passports and then with one more chip scan you walk onto the plane.

Now let's say in 10 years time the then idol of teenagers (think Britney before the meltdown) stars in a movie called ‘Gettin' chipped', a clever exercise in marketing the technology.

Forget about ethical concerns, legal issues and possible health problems, you will have pre-teens, and teens begging their parents to get ‘chipped'.

”But Mum, Dad having one saved Ivy Benhad’s life in ‘Gettin’ chipped' and it could save mine,” the teenager will wail.

This is, after all, the digital-native generation that has grown up embracing technology, not fearing it and they only see the benefits rather than the downsides. For instance, you will never hear a digital native - those under 25 years - fret about overusing their cellphone or playing too much Playstation. (Although, plenty enough people over 25 have fretted on their behalf; they are known as parents.)

There are still a few stumbling blocks before the terms ‘gettin' chipped' and ‘I'm chipped' can go mainstream as ‘google it' has.

The first and rather huge elephant in the room is compatibility. What one scanner will recognise, another might not. Triggering retail store security systems on an occasional basis, and being bailed up as a potential shoplifter, would take the gloss off being chipped.

And as quickly as you can say ‘spare a dime governor', Hollywood will also have a movie out called ‘Erased', about a chipped person whose chip gets wiped and in the cybernet, sci-fi world of our movie, you cease to exist.

The compatibility issues will be sorted out in time, just the way ATMs can now be used by any bank customer. Security concerns will be an ongoing issue, but then they are today in ICT and we just have to live with that.

So, in say 20 years, while in a supermarket queue and swiping a piece of plastic through a machine and having to tap in a four digit number, you could well hear that ‘chipped' 20-something behind you mutter; ”hurry up Grandad, how about gettin' chipped”.